Author Archives: MPI

Home / Archived Article(s) by Author:

How to Choose the ETFs That Fit You

By MPI5th November 2025Smart moneyaccumulating, cost, distributing, ETF, investing, physical, Replication, risk, synthetic, Tax, TER, UCITS

ETF Investing

ETF Research

How to Choose the ETFs That Fit You

Published: November 5, 2025

Starting to invest doesn’t have to be complicated—especially when execution costs aren’t fighting you. With trading fees as low as 0.14% + €3 on European markets and zero custody fees, the frictions you feel most are no longer at the broker. They are upstream—in the way you set objectives, select exposures, and control risk. This article lays out a complete, analyst-grade framework: from purpose and horizon to replication, TER vs. tracking difference, liquidity, taxes, hedging, and a disciplined implementation plan.

1) Purpose, Horizon, Constraints: the Investment Triangle

Every ETF choice sits inside a triangle of purpose (what you’re solving), horizon (how long capital stays), and constraints (risk tolerance, taxes, liquidity needs). Reverse the sequence and you get noise. Lead with the triangle and product selection gets easier.

Purpose: Are you building long-horizon wealth (retirement), a medium-horizon goal (home, education), or a buffer (emergency fund)? Each maps to a different volatility budget.
Horizon: Short horizons amplify mark-to-market risk. Long horizons make drawdowns survivable—if the allocation is appropriate.
Constraints: Tax regime, currency of liabilities, need for distributions, ethical screens, maximum drawdown comfort.

Ray Dalio frames diversification as the “Holy Grail”: reduce expected risk more than expected return. Warren Buffett counters that diversification can be protection against ignorance. Both are true—at different stages. Early on, default to breadth. With skill and proof, earn the right to concentrate.

2) When ETFs Are the Right Tool—And When They Aren’t

ETFs are access technology: low cost, transparent, tradable. They’re superb for equity beta, broad bond exposure, and systematic tilts. But they’re not always optimal.

Emergency funds & near-term cash: Prefer direct purchases of very short-dated government bills for precise maturity and rate control. Bond ETFs, by design, roll maturities and carry small duration risk.
Idiosyncratic convictions: If your edge is in a single issuer or niche, an ETF may dilute the thesis—use with care.

Outside of these cases, ETFs remain the default for most long-run portfolios.

3) The Core Allocation: Theory That Still Works

Seven decades after Markowitz and Sharpe, the core idea persists: pair growth assets with stabilizers. In ETF-land, that looks like one or two broad equity funds, one or two bond funds, and optional sleeves for real assets.

Classic 60/40 (modernized)

60% global equities (developed + optional EM), 40% investment-grade bonds (global aggregate with attention to duration).

All-Weather–style balance

~30% equities, 40–45% government bonds split across durations, 10–15% inflation-linked, 5–10% real assets (commodities/gold via UCITS/ETC).

Choose a baseline, automate contributions, and rebalance annually. Complexity is optional; discipline is not.

Local context: Short-term bursts are real—e.g., a BET/BET-TRN ETF has recently offered ~35–40% returns in a year. Wonderful, but design the policy portfolio for the next 10–20 years, not the last 10–20 months.

4) What Exactly Are You Buying? Index, Structure, Replication

4.1 Index definition

MSCI World (developed-only) is not FTSE All-World (developed + emerging). Sector tilts differ across providers. Read the methodology: country eligibility, free-float adjustments, small-cap inclusion, reconstitution rules.

4.2 UCITS and domicile

For European investors, UCITS funds domiciled in Ireland or Luxembourg are the standard. Domicile affects tax treaties and dividend withholding leakage (especially on U.S. equity exposure).

4.3 Physical vs. synthetic replication

Physical: holds the underlying securities; simple, transparent. May engage in securities lending—check the revenue split and collateral policies.
Synthetic: uses swaps to track the index; can improve tracking for hard-to-access markets but adds counterparty complexity. UCITS limits mitigate risks; still, understand the structure.

4.4 Full replication vs. sampling

Full replication owns all constituents—best for liquid, concentrated indices. Sampling owns a representative basket—common in very broad or less liquid universes; reduces costs but can increase tracking error in stressed liquidity.

4.5 Distributing vs. accumulating

Distributing share classes pay out dividends; accumulating reinvest them. Match to cash-flow needs and your tax context. Over long horizons, automatic reinvestment simplifies compounding.

5) The Cost Reality: TER vs. Tracking Difference

TER (Total Expense Ratio) is the sticker price; tracking difference (index return minus fund return) is the paid price. A 0.07% TER fund with poor sampling or wide spreads can cost more than a 0.12% TER fund with tight tracking and deep liquidity. Compare like-for-like over the same period and currency.

Large, liquid universes (e.g., S&P 500 UCITS) often show TERs near 0.03%.
Smaller or frontier markets can run to 0.50–0.70%.
Spreads, securities lending revenue, and tax leakage all feed into tracking difference.

Compounded over decades, a few basis points matter. You control this lever—use it.

6) Liquidity, Spreads, and Capacity

ETF liquidity has two layers: secondary (exchange volume, bid–ask) and primary (AP creation/redemption in the underlying). AUM and 3-month ADV are good first filters; then inspect the bid–ask spread and intraday premium/discount behavior.

Prefer funds with stable AP support and consistent spreads in volatile sessions.
Check multiple listings (Xetra, Euronext, LSE) if your broker routes across venues.
For very large orders, consider risk or NAV-based trades via your broker.

7) Currency, Hedging, and the Liability Side

Decide at the portfolio level how much FX risk you accept. Many long-term investors keep equity exposure unhedged (growth offsets FX noise) and hedge parts of the bond book to align with spending currency. Hedged share classes add a small ongoing cost; they reduce FX volatility but do not change expected returns.

8) Putting It All Together: Model Line-ups (Illustrative)

Global Core (accumulating)

70% Global Equity UCITS (World or All-World)
20% Global Aggregate Bond UCITS (EUR-hedged share class)
5% Gold ETC (UCITS-friendly)
5% Broad Commodities UCITS

Rationale: equity growth engine; bonds stabilize and match euro liabilities; small real-asset sleeve for regime hedging.

Quality Tilt (long horizon)

50% Global Equity UCITS
15% Quality factor UCITS (global)
10% Dividend growth UCITS
20% Global Aggregate Bond UCITS
5% Gold ETC

Rationale: systematic tilts toward resilient earnings and income; still anchored by a broad core.

All-Weather Bias (defensive)

30% Global Equity UCITS
25% Long-duration Gov Bond UCITS
15% Intermediate Gov Bond UCITS
15% Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS
7.5% Gold ETC · 7.5% Broad Commodities UCITS

Rationale: regime diversification: growth, disinflation, inflation, and commodity shocks.

Implementation discipline: automate monthly contributions, rebalance annually (or when weights drift by ±20% relative), document changes in an Investment Policy Statement.

9) Due Diligence Workflow (Repeatable)

Define exposure (index, region, cap range, factor).
Screen UCITS ETFs (domicile, provider, AUM, ADV, spread).
Compare costs (TER, 3–5y tracking difference, lending policy).
Assess structure (physical vs synthetic; full vs sampling; distributing vs accumulating).
Tax (withholding leakage, your personal regime, ISA/PEA/third-pillar constraints where relevant).
Operational (listings you can access, settlement, broker fees—e.g., 0.14% + €3; zero custody helps).
Write the rationale (1 paragraph). If you can’t explain it, don’t own it.

10) Advanced Topics: Factors, Bonds, and Real Assets

Equity factors

Quality (profitability, low leverage) and dividend growth pair well with a global core. Small-cap raises cyclicality; size positions modestly.

Fixed income

Duration is your macro lever. Keep the bond sleeve simple (aggregate + govies), then add inflation-linked if your liabilities are CPI-sensitive.

Gold & commodities

Use UCITS-compliant ETC/ETFs. Keep sizing measured (5–10%)—they hedge regimes, not day-to-day moves.

11) Behavior: Where Portfolios Live or Die

The best ETF line-up fails without behavioral guardrails. Write—and sign—three rules:

Loss rule: “If the equity sleeve draws down 25%, I rebalance to target, not de-risk.”
Gain rule: “If a tilt doubles, I trim back to policy weights.”
Change rule: “I change the policy portfolio only after a 30-day cooling period and a written memo.”

Larry Fink often notes: ETFs democratize access. The edge is not cleverness; it’s consistency at low cost.

12) A Short, Real-World Contrast

Two globally popular UCITS ETFs—one tracking MSCI World (developed-only), one tracking FTSE All-World (developed + emerging)—delivered different 5-year EUR outcomes (~low three digits vs. high nineties %). Neither is “better” in isolation; the index design, EM inclusion, and sector weights explain the gap. The “right” choice is the one that fits your purpose, horizon, and constraints.

Bottom Line: A Framework That Scales

Start with purpose, horizon, constraints.
Pick a core allocation and keep it boring.
Understand index, structure, replication.
Optimize real costs: TER and tracking difference.
Mind liquidity, taxes, and FX hedging.
Add tilts deliberately; size them modestly.
Automate contributions; rebalance annually; document changes.

Do these things at low cost—and let time and compounding do the heavy lifting.

Global Markets Recap — October 2025: AI Optimism, Rate Cuts, and a Shifting Global Balance

By MPI4th November 2025Good to knowbitcoin, Crypto, DAX, Global markets, Gold, Nikkei 225, Oil, STOXX 600, US markets

Monthly Macro

Global Markets Recap — October 2025: AI Optimism, Rate Cuts, and a Shifting Global Balance

November 2025

October 2025 will be remembered as a turning point for global markets — a month where optimism surrounding artificial intelligence collided with central bank rate cuts, geopolitical maneuvering, and record-breaking performances across continents. From Wall Street to Tokyo, from the shimmering rally in gold to the cooling winds of crypto, investors navigated a complex but largely bullish landscape.

U.S. Markets: New Highs Fueled by AI and Policy Easing

In the United States, stocks pressed to fresh records as the Federal Reserve delivered a widely telegraphed 25 bps rate cut and signaled an end to quantitative tightening on December 1. Chair Jerome Powell kept a cautiously hawkish tone — “another cut in December is not a foregone conclusion” — yet investors heard what they needed: an easier policy setting into year-end.

Technology once again stole the show. The so-called Magnificent Seven remained the market’s center of gravity, while Nvidia briefly crossed a $5T valuation, now representing roughly 8% of the S&P 500’s market cap — an unprecedented milestone. Earnings breadth helped too: nearly 70% of S&P 500 companies beat sales expectations, the best four-year print, with AI-driven demand lifting cloud and semis. The trade-off: executives flagged heavier capex in 2026 to keep pace with AI infrastructure.

Market Reaction

S&P 500 advanced a little over 2% in October; the Nasdaq Composite added nearly 5%.
Inflation stayed contained, with core CPI ~3% year-on-year.
The brief federal shutdown shaved an estimated 1–2 pp from Q4 real GDP, a temporary drag.

Why It Matters

AI is no longer a theme — it’s become the market’s cash-flow engine and capex agenda.
Policy is friendlier at the margin, but divergence inside the FOMC could still stir volatility.
A one-year U.S.–China trade arrangement (tariff trimming, rare-earths relief, ag buys) cools a key tail risk.

Europe: Easing Inflation, Political Friction, and Understated Resilience

Across the Atlantic, European equities moved moderately higher. The STOXX 600 gained roughly 2.5%, with CAC 40 near +3% on luxury and energy leadership, while DAX stayed largely flat amid industrial softness. The ECB kept its key rate at 2% for a third meeting, balancing disinflation with a still-resilient economy.

Eurozone GDP expanded about 0.2% in Q3, beating expectations as Spain and France outperformed. Headline inflation fell toward the 2% target, though services inflation remained sticky, a reminder that the path to price stability rarely runs in a straight line. The Commission’s new Affordable Energy Action Plan underscored the bloc’s structural challenge: cutting power costs while accelerating the green transition.

In France, Prime Minister Sébastien Lecornu resigned just weeks into the job, extending a period of political churn. In the U.K., consumer confidence hit cycle highs even as growth cooled, nudging markets to price a BoE cut by year-end.

Germany remained the weak link: industrial production contracted and auto output fell sharply, while exports softened against a backdrop of trade frictions. Even so, inflation stabilized and the trade surplus widened — a reminder that Europe’s largest economy still benefits from competitive niches and external demand.

Asia: Japan’s Surge, China’s Slowdown, and a Story of Divergence

Asia told two stories at once. Japan delivered the headline: the Nikkei 225 jumped nearly 17% to a record high, buoyed by expectations of expansionary fiscal policy under newly appointed Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi. Defense, energy, and technology are set to benefit most, and the market is cheering the prospect of firmer nominal growth.

South Korea’s KOSPI rallied almost 20% as foreign capital returned to semiconductor leaders. Hong Kong’s Hang Seng fell more than 3% on weak external demand and lingering China concerns.

China Snapshot

Manufacturing PMI: ~49.0 — seventh monthly contraction.
Prices: CPI around −0.3% y/y, PPI near −2.3% — deflationary undertow persists.
Growth: Q3 GDP slowed to ~4.8%; retail sales and industrial output beat modestly.

Policy Pulse

BoJ held rates near 0.5% even as Tokyo core inflation hovered around 2.8%.
PBoC prioritized currency stability over fresh easing.

The throughline is divergence: Japan and Korea are drawing capital on governance improvements and tech leadership, while China manages a slower, more complex adjustment across property, industry, and prices.

Commodities: Gold’s Historic Breakout, Oil’s Uneasy Range

Gold finally did it: the metal vaulted above $4,000/oz for the first time, peaking near $4,381 before settling around the round number into month-end. Drivers were familiar but potent — expectations for lower policy rates, persistent geopolitical hedging, and heavy central-bank buying. Over 12 months, gold’s gain is north of 45%, with major banks now floating $4,900–$5,000 targets on robust ETF and institutional demand.

Elsewhere in the complex, silver, platinum, and palladium rode the tide higher, supported by haven flows and strategic industrial uses.

Meanwhile, oil struggled. Brent chalked up a third monthly decline, spending most of October between $61–$66/bbl and briefly tagging $60, its lowest since May. Fears of surplus supply, soft refinery runs, and record U.S. output kept rallies capped, even as U.S. sanctions and inventory draws provided episodic lift.

Unless demand reaccelerates into year-end, crude looks range-bound — a relief valve for inflation, but a challenge for energy earnings momentum.

Crypto: “Uptober” Breaks Its Streak

For seven straight years, October had been kind to Bitcoin. Not this time. After setting a fresh all-time high near $126k early in the month, the coin slipped roughly 4% to finish near $110k. A tariff-heavy headline tape sparked the largest liquidation wave on record mid-month, sending prices down double digits within minutes before stabilizing.

Still, the market backdrop looks more mature than in past cycles: institutional inflows are stickier, exchange reserves are lower, and long-term holder behavior is more disciplined. That won’t immunize crypto from macro shocks — but it does argue for a less boom-and-bust-prone structure ahead.

Why It Matters

October’s rally and record prints mark a transition in market psychology. Investors are tilting back toward growth and innovation just as policy pivots from restrictive to merely tight. Yet the foundation is uneven: geopolitics remain fluid, valuations are ambitious in places, and regional cycles are out of sync. That asymmetry cuts both ways — it creates opportunity for global allocators, and it raises the premium on risk management.

The simultaneous surge in AI-linked equities and gold is not a contradiction; it’s a signal. Investors are positioning for technological abundance — and hedging for a world that may not arrive on schedule.

Investor Takeaways

Positioning

Barbell exposure: pair quality growth (AI, cloud, semis) with measured real-asset hedges (gold, select industrial metals).
Lean global: Japan/Korea momentum vs. Europe’s disinflation stability; be selective in China.
Duration sensitivity: easing supports long duration, but sticky services inflation can reprice quickly.

Risk Management

Capex watch: AI build-out boosts top-line, but mind free-cash-flow trade-offs through 2026.
Geopolitics: tariff headlines, rare-earths policy, and election calendars are live variables.
Energy asymmetry: lower oil helps inflation, but undercuts energy earnings; balance sector exposures.

ExxonMobil Q3 2025: Record Production, Strong Dividends, and Confident Long-Term Outlook

By MPI3rd November 2025StocksDividend, ExxonMobil, invest, Oil, stocks, XOM

ExxonMobil

ExxonMobil Q3 2025: Record Production, Strong Dividends, and Confident Long-Term Outlook ⛽

Published November 3, 2025 · My Passive Income

Exxon Mobil Corporation (NYSE: XOM) delivered a resilient quarter in a volatile energy backdrop. Record output in Guyana and the Permian Basin, early project start-ups, and disciplined capital returns anchored performance, while management reiterated a confident multi-year plan through 2030.

📊 Key Takeaways

Q3 2025 results:

Revenue: $93B (−5.2% YoY; −1.4% vs. consensus)
Net income: $21B (+13.8% QoQ)
Adjusted EPS: $2.88 (−2.1% YoY; +3.2% vs. estimates)

Production milestones: Guyana >700k bpd (record); Permian >1.7M bpd (new high); total company output ~4.8M boe/d.

Cash returns:

Dividend: raised 4% to $1.03/share (~3.5% yield); $4.2B paid in Q3
Buybacks: $5.1B in Q3; on track for ~$20B in 2025
Net debt: up ≈$3B QoQ amid higher capex and M&A

Post-earnings action: shares dipped ~1.8% initially but closed flat at $114.64. Expected move: ±1.7%.

Growth projects: Ten developments—led by Yellowtail (early) and Hammerhead (approved)—are expected to add >$3B annual profit at steady prices/margins, forming the backbone of 2025–2030 plans.

🛢️ Segment Performance

Segment	Revenue (USD B)	YoY	Profit (USD B)	Notes
Upstream	29.5	+4%	5.7	Record Guyana & Permian output; early Yellowtail; Hammerhead approved
Energy Products	36.5	+2%	1.84	Record refining volumes; higher margins on global supply disruptions
Chemical Products	12.3	−8%	0.52	Weaker China margins; record high-value product sales
Specialty Products	6.1	−3%	0.74	Seasonal volume dip; expands into battery materials via Superior Graphite

🗣️ Management Commentary & Outlook

2025–2030 plan:

8 of 10 key projects already online
Permian output target: ~2.3M boe/d by 2030
Annual buybacks maintained at ~$20B
Additional cost savings: >$18B by 2030 (on top of $14B since 2019)
Net debt around ~9.5%

Near-term (Q4 ’25–2026):

Total production ≈ 4.7M boe/d in 2025 (+9% YoY)
CAPEX: $27–29B in 2025 (YTD +14.7% YoY to $20.9B)
Refining margins volatile; high-value chemicals steady; battery-materials ramp

CEO Darren Woods: “We’ve delivered over $14B in structural savings since 2019—about $2.5B per year—doubling profit per barrel versus five years ago.
We remain deeply committed to the dividend through commodity cycles.”

CFO Kathryn Mikells: “We benchmark dividend growth versus global peers, the S&P, and industrials—and we believe we are in a very strong position.”

⚙️ Opportunities & Risks

Opportunities

Battery materials diversification: Superior Graphite acquisition adds exposure to anode materials (≈$40B TAM).
Tech-enabled exploration: Discovery 6 supercomputer accelerates seismic processing in Guyana, improving drilling efficiency.
Operational efficiency: >$14B cost reductions since 2019; target >$18B by 2030 boosts profitability per barrel.

Risks

Refining margin volatility can swing quarterly operating profit.
Project execution risk on large developments (e.g., Hammerhead, Singapore Resid Upgrade).
Commodity-price sensitivity and leverage optics amid elevated capex.

💬 Market Sentiment & Valuation

Analysts focused on capital allocation, technology leverage, and dividend sustainability. The tone was neutral-to-positive, with added emphasis on investment discipline and low-carbon initiatives versus last quarter.

Target price: $127 (~+10.9% upside from $114.64)
Rating: Moderate Buy (20 analysts: 10 Hold, 8 Buy, 2 Strong Buy)

Initial selloff (~−1.8%) reversed into a flat close, as investors weighed higher leverage against improving project mix and durable cash returns.

📌 Bottom Line

ExxonMobil’s Q3 2025 underscores scale, execution, and discipline: record production, a growing dividend, and a clear portfolio of high-return projects.
While oil-price swings and refining margins will drive quarters, cost efficiency and a steadfast return framework keep the long-term thesis intact for dividend-focused investors.

Apple’s Fiscal Q4 2025: Strong Finish, AI Investments Power Optimistic Outlook

By MPI1st November 2025StocksAirPods, Apple Inc., invest, iPad, iPhone, Mac, stock, Vision Pro

Apple’s Fiscal Q4 2025: Strong Finish, AI Investments Power Optimistic Outlook 🍎

Published November 1, 2025 · My Passive Income

Apple wrapped up its fiscal year above expectations and guided confidently into the holiday quarter, backed by robust iPhone 17 demand and a record-setting Services business. Management highlighted accelerating AI investments and momentum across key emerging markets.

📈 Key Takeaways

Fiscal Q4 2025 (headline results):

Revenue: $105B (+7.9% YoY; +9% QoQ), ~0.2% above consensus
Net income: $25B (+86.4% YoY)
Diluted EPS: $1.85 (+17.8% QoQ; +12.8% YoY), +4.1% vs. estimates
EBIT: $34B (+9.8% YoY)

Capital returns & dividend:

$14B dividends + $90.7B buybacks in FY2025
Total capital returned since 2012: $994B (set to surpass $1T in Q1 2026)
New dividend: $0.26/share, payable Nov 13, 2025 (~0.38% yield)

After-hours: shares closed at a record and added ~+3.2% post-print · Expected move: ±3% · Catalyst: upbeat holiday guidance.

Emerging markets: record sales in India, the Middle East, and Africa — now a core pillar of Apple’s long-term growth strategy.

📱 Segment Performance

Segment	Revenue (USD)	YoY	Analyst Estimate	Notes
iPhone	$49B	+6.1%	$50.2B	Strong demand; minor supply tightness on select models
Mac	$7B	+12.7%	$8.6B	M-series momentum; mixed channel comps
iPad	$9B	≈0%	$6.9B	Stable base after prior cycles
Wearables & Accessories (Watch, AirPods, Vision Pro)	$9B	≈0%	$8.5B	Vision Pro offsets softer accessories
Services	$28B	+15.1%	$28.2B	>75% gross margin; record revenue

🔮 Outlook & Call Highlights

Q1 FY2026 (holiday quarter) guidance:

Total revenue growth: +10–12% YoY (potential all-time record quarter)
iPhone revenue: double-digit growth expected
Gross margin: 47–48% (includes ~$1.4B tariff costs)
OpEx: $18.1–18.5B
Services: growth ~+15% YoY

Tim Cook, CEO:

“It’s all about the product. The iPhone 17 lineup is the strongest we’ve ever had and it’s resonating globally.”
“Supply is tight on several iPhone 17 models due to very strong demand — not a production issue.”
“China is vibrant and dynamic; traffic is up and we expect to return to growth in Q1.”

Kevan Parekh, CFO: “We’re intensifying AI investments; most OpEx growth is R&D-driven and supports our long-term roadmap.”

⚙️ Opportunities

iPhone 17 supercycle: strongest launch in Apple history; double-digit growth expected in Q1 FY2026.
AI ecosystem expansion: multi-year spend (AI, advanced manufacturing, chip engineering) targeting efficiency and margin leverage.
Geographic expansion: records in India, the Middle East, Africa broaden the user base.
Services engine: +15% YoY, >75% gross margin, deepening recurring, high-profit revenue.
Customer loyalty: active device base at all-time high, reinforcing cross-sell and durability.

⚠️ Risks

Tariffs: ~$1.4B headwind to gross margin in Q1 FY2026.
Supply tightness: limited availability on select iPhone 17 models amid elevated demand.
OpEx pressure: higher AI/R&D spend may weigh on margins near-term.
China volatility: Q4 FY2025 down ~4% YoY; management expects a rebound in Q1.

🧭 Market Sentiment & Valuation

Analysts focused on iPhone 17 demand, China recovery, Services sustainability, and AI-driven OpEx. Tone was neutral-to-positive, with upgraded guidance (from “mid-to-high single digits” to +10–12% YoY growth).

Ratings (35 analysts):

4 Strong Buy · 18 Buy · 11 Hold · 2 Sell → Moderate Buy
Consensus target price: $249 (~5.9% downside from $271.40)

Valuation:

Forward P/E (Apple): ~49× — ~43% above tech sector median (~25.5×)
Forward P/E (S&P 500): ~24×

Premium reflects ecosystem resilience, Services profitability, and AI monetization optionality.

📌 Bottom Line

Apple ends FY2025 on a strong note. With iPhone 17 demand, a high-margin Services engine, and stepped-up AI investment, the company enters 2026 with confidence. Near-term margin headwinds (tariffs, R&D) are the trade-off for long-term platform strength.

Amazon Soars on Q3 2025 Results as AWS Accelerates Cloud Growth

By MPI31st October 2025StocksAmazon, AWS, cloud, Project Rainier, Trainium

Amazon Soars on Q3 2025 Results as AWS Accelerates Cloud Growth ☁️

Published October 31, 2025 · My Passive Income

Amazon (US.AMZN) shares jumped in after-hours trading as Q3 2025 results beat expectations, powered by an acceleration in AWS. The quarter reinforced the view that Amazon’s next growth chapter will be driven by AI and cloud infrastructure.

🚀 Headline Results: Better Than Expected

Revenue: $180.17B (+13% YoY), above analyst estimates (~$175.33B)
Net income: $21.19B (+38% YoY)
Adjusted EPS: $1.95 (+36% YoY; vs. $1.57 expected)
Operating income: $17.4B (flat YoY; includes $4.3B special costs)

After-hours move: +10% (intraday commentary cited up to +13%)
Expected move: ±5.9%

Context: Strength was broad, with cloud and advertising outpacing expectations while core retail rebounded into peak seasonality.

📦 Segment Performance

🛒 Online retail: +10% YoY, helped by July Prime Day
☁️ AWS: $33B revenue (+20% YoY; est. $32.42B) · Operating profit $11.4B (+9% YoY) · ~two-thirds of Amazon’s total operating profit
📢 Advertising: $17.7B (+22% YoY; est. $17.34B)

🧭 Guidance & Key Messages

Q4 2025 outlook:

Revenue: $206–213B (midpoint $209.5B; +10–13% YoY)
Operating income: $21–26B (vs. $23.8B expected; $21.2B in Q4 2024)

CapEx 2025: raised to $125B (from $118B), with further increases likely in 2026 for data centers and AI capacity.

Trade & tariffs: Amazon reports stable marketplace pricing despite tariff noise, suggesting third-party sellers are absorbing part of the cost pressures.

Restructuring: ~14,000 corporate roles reduced to streamline operations; management says the move is cultural/operational, not purely financial.

🗣️ CEO Andy Jassy on AI, Chips, and Capacity

“AWS is growing at a pace we haven’t seen since 2022,” said CEO Andy Jassy, citing strong demand for both AI services and core cloud infrastructure. Amazon added 3.8 GW of capacity over the last 12 months and expects to double capacity by 2027.

On silicon strategy, Amazon continues to offer choice (including NVIDIA) while promoting its own Trainium accelerators, which management claims deliver 30–40% better price-performance. Trainium3 is expected to be ~40% faster than Trainium2 and is a priority for rapid, large-scale deployment.

💡 Opportunities

Project Rainier: $11B AI data center built for Anthropic (Claude) signals deepening strategic ties with leading model providers.
AI product stack: Q (enterprise assistant), Bedrock (gen-AI platform), and Rufus (shopping assistant used by 250M customers; boosts completion likelihood by ~60%).
Seasonal tailwinds: October’s “Prime Big Deal Days” provided momentum into the holiday quarter.

⚠️ Risks to Watch

Power availability: “Energy might be the main constraint,” Jassy said; chip supply could become a bottleneck later.
Reliability: A significant AWS US-EAST-1 outage on Oct 20, 2025 affected hundreds of services, spotlighting uptime and incident costs.
Competition: AWS’s rebound is clear, but growth still trails Microsoft and Alphabet in some estimates — execution and cost leadership remain critical.

📈 Bottom Line

Amazon is firmly back in growth mode. AWS is re-accelerating, advertising is expanding, and retail is resilient heading into peak season. The balancing act: fund massive AI and cloud build-outs while protecting margins and reliability. For investors, the thesis centers on cloud + AI scale driving multi-year operating leverage.

Booking vs. Royal Caribbean – Two Travel Giants, Two Different Journeys

By MPI29th October 2025StocksBooking, investing, Royal Caribbean, stocks

Booking vs. Royal Caribbean: Two Travel Giants, Two Different Journeys

Published October 29, 2025 · My Passive Income

Two of the biggest names in global travel just reported results. While Booking Holdings (Nasdaq:BKNG) continues to climb on the strength of digital travel demand, Royal Caribbean (Nasdaq:RCL) finds itself navigating choppier waters, pressured by higher costs and softer pricing. Here’s how both players are positioned going into the final stretch of 2025 — and into 2026.

Booking Holdings: Flying Smoothly Above Expectations

Booking Holdings once again delivered a strong quarter, reinforcing the idea that travel demand remains resilient. The company beat expectations across key metrics and showed that global consumers are still prioritizing travel spending, even in an uncertain macro environment.

Headline results (Q3 2025):

Adjusted EPS: $99.50 (above FactSet estimate of $95.85)
Net profit: $2.75 billion, +9% vs. Q3 2024
Revenue: $9.01 billion, +13% YoY (estimate: $8.73 billion)
Gross bookings: $49.7 billion, +14% YoY (estimate: $48 billion)
Nights booked: 323 million, +8% YoY (vs. ~6% expected)

Q4 2025 outlook:

+4–6% growth in nights booked
+11–13% growth in total gross bookings
+10–12% revenue growth (slightly below analyst forecasts)

“Despite ongoing macroeconomic and geopolitical uncertainty, we’re pleased to see positive momentum, with steady travel demand so far in the fourth quarter,” the company said.

Stock snapshot:

+4.8% after-hours reaction
+2.6% YTD (still trailing the S&P 500)
Market cap: $165.96B
Forward P/E: 23.5× (vs. sector median ~17.7×)

What the analysts see: Booking continues to post impressive top-line expansion, with ~17.6% annualized revenue growth over the last three years. That said, the forward view is more measured: consensus expects revenue growth of just ~8.3% in the next 12 months. Translation: investors are paying a premium multiple for a company that is still growing — but not at “hypergrowth” levels anymore.

Royal Caribbean: Sailing Through Choppy Waters

For Royal Caribbean, the story is more complicated. Demand is strong, bookings are healthy, and 2026 looks promising. But short-term pressure from costs and pricing is starting to worry investors.

Headline results (Q3 2025):

Adjusted EPS: $5.75 (slightly above estimates)
Revenue: $5.14B (below $5.17B expected)
Ticket revenue: $3.64B (+3.4% vs. 2024)
Onboard & other revenue: $1.5B (+6% YoY; in line with expectations)
Advance onboard bookings: ~50%, with ~90% of those bookings done digitally

Cost pressures:

Net cruise cost per available day (ex-fuel): +4.8%
Higher fuel and maintenance costs
Normalizing ticket prices after a post-pandemic boom
Investor concerns about cash flow and future capex plans

Forward guidance:

Q4 2025 EPS forecast: $2.74–$2.79
Full-year 2025 guidance: $15.58–$15.63 per share
2026 outlook: “We expect EPS starting with a 17,” said the CEO

Royal Caribbean is also leaning heavily on product pipeline and differentiated experiences:

Record expected occupancy in 2026
New flagship demand from Star of the Seas and Celebrity Xcel
Strong interest in Royal Beach Club Paradise Island
Celebrity River itineraries nearly sold out immediately after launch

Stock snapshot:

-12% in pre-market trading after the report
Selloff driven mainly by margin fears, not demand fears

The message from the market is clear: demand alone isn’t enough anymore. Investors now want proof that cruise operators can protect margins, manage fuel and maintenance costs, and generate cash while still investing in new ships and destinations.

Two Travel Stories, One Sector in Motion

Looking at Booking and Royal Caribbean side by side gives us a snapshot of the wider travel industry in late 2025:

Booking Holdings: an asset-light, digital marketplace that scales globally with relatively low incremental cost per booking.
Royal Caribbean: a capital-intensive operator with physical assets, higher fixed costs, and direct exposure to fuel, labor, and maintenance inflation.

Both benefit from the same macro driver: consumers still prioritize experiences, travel, and leisure time. But the way that demand turns into profit is very different.

Booking is being rewarded for efficient growth, strong margins, and visibility into future bookings.
Royal Caribbean is being punished not for lack of demand — demand looks excellent — but for rising costs and worries about how sustainable current pricing really is.

Quick Takeaway

Booking Holdings: still in control, still highly profitable, still scaling. The market is paying a premium multiple for that clarity.
Royal Caribbean: healthy booking pipeline and record occupancy in sight, but investors are asking: at what cost to margins and cash flow?

Bondora Go & Grow: Investing Made Effortless for Everyone

By MPI28th October 2025Smart moneyBondora, Go & Grow, investing, passive income, welcome bonus

Bondora Go & Grow: Investing Made Effortless for Everyone

Published October 28, 2025 · My Passive Income

Bondora Go & Grow is designed to remove friction from investing. With daily growth, instant access to funds, and a simple experience built for real people (not just finance pros), it’s one of the easiest ways to start growing your money online.

Investing, Simplified

In a world where traditional investing often feels complex and intimidating, Bondora Go & Grow stands out as one of the most straightforward ways to grow your money online. Built for both beginners and seasoned investors, the platform allows users to earn up to 6%* annual return, with daily growth and instant access to funds.

No complicated settings. No hidden fees. No waiting months to withdraw your money. Go & Grow turns investing into something almost effortless: you deposit, you watch it grow, and you stay in control.

How Go & Grow Works

The idea behind Bondora’s Go & Grow is simple: you deposit money, and Bondora automatically diversifies it across thousands of loans issued to borrowers across Europe. Your earnings accumulate daily and can be withdrawn at any time, giving you both liquidity and predictability — a mix that’s rare in traditional P2P lending products.

Key benefits include:

Target return: up to 6%* p.a.
Instant withdrawals
No lock-in period
No management or withdrawal fees
Low minimum investment – start with just €1

Go & Grow was designed for people who want to build a long-term passive income stream without micromanaging investments every single day.

Who Is It For?

Bondora Go & Grow is ideal for:

People new to investing who want a safe, simple way to start
Experienced investors looking for a low-effort, low-volatility component in their portfolio
Anyone frustrated with traditional savings accounts that pay almost nothing

Whether you’re saving for travel, your first home, or long-term financial security, Go & Grow offers a practical, digital-first way to build towards those goals.

Transparency and Trust

Founded in 2008 and based in Estonia, Bondora is one of Europe’s longest-running peer-to-peer lending platforms. With more than €900 million invested and over 180,000 investors across 40+ countries, Bondora has built its reputation on transparency, simplicity, and reliability.

Every Go & Grow investor gets access to a clear dashboard showing:

Daily earnings
Total balance
Deposit and withdrawal history

This level of visibility makes it easy to understand how your portfolio is doing at any moment — without spreadsheets or manual tracking.

Why Investors Choose Go & Grow

Bondora’s mission is to make investing as effortless as possible. Unlike traditional P2P platforms, you don’t select individual loans or manage risk manually. The system does the heavy lifting for you, while you benefit from stable daily growth.

Go & Grow combines:

Automation – Bondora’s allocation engine puts money to work efficiently
Flexibility – withdraw anytime, with no penalties
Growth – daily returns that compound over time

It’s one of the closest real-world versions of “set it and forget it” investing, while still keeping your money accessible.

🎁 Investor Welcome Bonus

New investors receive a €5 welcome bonus automatically in their Go & Grow account after signing up. It’s a simple boost to help you get started.

How the bonus works:

A €5 bonus is added automatically to a new investor’s Go & Grow account after sign-up, but it cannot be withdrawn during the first 30 days.
To keep the bonus, the investor must deposit at least €50 within 30 days of registering.
After that period, if the account balance is below €55 (€50 deposit + €5 bonus), the bonus will be removed.
If the balance is €55 or more, the bonus becomes withdrawable — it’s yours.

In practice, this bonus encourages you to build a real starting position instead of just “testing with €1 and forgetting about it.” It rewards commitment and momentum.

Final Thoughts

In an age of financial noise and complexity, Bondora Go & Grow represents a refreshing return to simplicity. It’s an accessible way for anyone — from students to professionals — to start building wealth without needing to become a finance expert.

*Go & Grow is not a guaranteed investment product, and returns may vary. Capital at risk.

Whether you’re just getting started or you’re looking for a stable, easily manageable component in your portfolio, Go & Grow sits right between traditional saving and modern investing: simple, digital, and built for real life.

⚠️ Affiliate Disclosure

Some of the links on this page are affiliate links. This means that if you sign up or invest through them, I may receive a small commission — at no extra cost to you.

These commissions help support the site and allow me to continue publishing free educational content about personal finance, passive income, and investing.

IBM’s Mixed Quarter: Strong Results, Slower Cloud Growth, and a Quantum Future

By MPI27th October 2025StocksAI, AMD, hybrid cloud, IBM, multi-cloud, Quantum computing, Red Hat

IBM’s Mixed Quarter: Strong Earnings, Slower Cloud Growth, and a Quantum Future

Published October 27, 2025 · My Passive Income

IBM delivered better-than-expected revenue and profit, yet the stock fell sharply as investors questioned the growth trajectory of its hybrid cloud and AI strategy. At the same time, the company is quietly positioning itself for something even bigger: quantum leadership and national-level strategic relevance.

IBM Stock Drops Despite Beating Expectations

At Thursday’s U.S. market open, IBM shares fell more than 7%. The reaction looked harsh given that IBM actually beat Wall Street forecasts on both revenue and earnings — but the headline numbers weren’t the problem. The concern was momentum.

Quarterly revenue: $16.33 billion (+9% year-over-year), ahead of the $16.09 billion consensus.

Adjusted EPS: $2.65 per share, beating expectations of $2.45.

Hybrid cloud revenue: +14% growth, versus +16% last quarter, and below what the market wanted to see — especially in Red Hat, IBM’s core bet on hybrid cloud and enterprise AI.

For many investors, that slowdown is the real story. Hybrid cloud and Red Hat are supposed to be IBM’s high-growth engines. Any deceleration there raises questions about how fully IBM can monetize demand for AI and cloud services going forward.

Inside the Business Segments

IBM’s latest report shows a company with multiple engines running at different speeds:

Software: $7.2 billion (+10%), broadly in line with expectations. This includes Red Hat and AI-aligned offerings.
Infrastructure: $3.56 billion (+17%), ahead of the ~$3.46 billion estimate, powered by demand for IBM Z mainframes.
Consulting: $5.3 billion (+3%), showing steadier, lower growth.

One number IBM really wants investors to notice: its “AI book of business.” That pipeline now exceeds $9.5 billion, up from about $7.5 billion reported in July. Roughly 80% of those AI contracts come from consulting work, with the rest from software. Even more interesting: around 80% of the ~300 AI customers IBM is currently working with are new clients onboarded in just the last two quarters. That signals accelerating enterprise appetite for AI deployment services — and IBM still has deep credibility in regulated, complex industries.

Free Cash Flow and the HashiCorp Deal

Under the surface, IBM remains financially sturdy. The company is targeting roughly $14 billion in free cash flow for 2025, giving it room to invest and acquire. One of the most important recent strategic moves: the $6.4 billion acquisition of HashiCorp, a cloud infrastructure automation specialist. IBM announced the deal at $35 per share in cash and has moved forward with integration.

The logic behind the acquisition is straightforward: HashiCorp’s tooling (Terraform, Vault, etc.) helps large enterprises automate and secure hybrid and multi-cloud environments — exactly where IBM wants to lead, alongside Red Hat and its watsonx AI platform. IBM completed the HashiCorp acquisition after clearing U.S. and U.K. regulatory review, and now positions HashiCorp as a core building block of its end-to-end hybrid cloud and AI stack.

Evercore ISI’s view: “M&A remains an underappreciated lever for IBM’s future growth,” supported by the company’s strong balance sheet and cash generation.

IBM’s Quantum Ambition: The Next “ChatGPT Moment”?

In April, the Wall Street Journal argued that now that IBM has emerged from “a long stretch of mediocrity,” it needs to prove itself in AI. But some investors believe the real breakout moment won’t be AI at all — it will be quantum computing.

IBM has spent years positioning itself as a leader in building universal quantum computing systems. The company has publicly stated plans to launch a large-scale quantum computer by 2029. That long-term vision isn’t just marketing: when investors were reminded of IBM’s quantum roadmap, the stock jumped about 8% in a single session and touched a new all-time high. (This rally followed headlines linking IBM’s quantum error-correction research to AMD hardware.)

Reuters recently reported that IBM has successfully run a quantum error-correction algorithm on AMD’s FPGA chips — a milestone later confirmed to CNBC by an IBM spokesperson. In parallel, Google announced that one of its in-house quantum systems can run certain workloads up to 13,000× faster than classical supercomputers, reinforcing the idea that quantum is transitioning from science fiction to industrial capability.

Quantum Computing Is Now Geopolitical

The race to dominate quantum computing isn’t just commercial anymore — it’s strategic. According to reporting in The Wall Street Journal, the U.S. government is exploring direct federal stakes in quantum companies such as IonQ, Rigetti Computing, and D-Wave Quantum, each seeking at least $10 million in backing. Other firms, including Atom Computing, are reportedly open to similar structures.

While the U.S. Department of Commerce has officially denied that negotiations are active, sources cited in those reports claim talks are already in advanced stages. The idea fits into a broader U.S. strategy: securing influence in “critical” technologies that have national security implications, not just commercial upside.

There’s precedent. The U.S. has recently taken partial stakes in areas seen as strategically vital — including a reported 15% position in rare-earth producer MP Materials and around 10% in Intel to support domestic semiconductor production. Quantum could be next in line.

Why the urgency? China is estimated to be investing roughly 2× more than the United States in quantum computing, according to the Quantum Economic Development Consortium. The message from Washington is simple: quantum is no longer optional. It’s infrastructure.

Who’s steering this? Reportedly, U.S. Deputy Commerce Secretary Paul Dabbar — who previously co-founded Bohr Quantum Technology — has been involved in discussions. That’s a sign the U.S. views quantum computing as both a growth engine and a national security lever.

So Where Does That Leave IBM?

IBM sits at the crossroads of three defining tech frontiers:

Hybrid cloud & Red Hat — still strategic, but now under scrutiny due to slowing growth.
Enterprise AI services — a $9.5B+ pipeline, mostly consulting-driven, with a surge of new clients in just two quarters.
Quantum computing — a moonshot that could reshape entire industries, from drug discovery to materials science, and may attract direct government backing.

Investors punished the stock for softer momentum in hybrid cloud, but long-term, IBM is trying to prove it’s no longer just a legacy mainframe company. It wants to be the infrastructure layer for the next era: AI at scale, automated multi-cloud, and commercially viable quantum.

That’s not a short-term trade. That’s a strategy for the next decade.

Debitum Investments Launches a Smarter Overview Page for Investors

By MPI23rd October 2025Peer-to-Peer LendingDebitum Investments, peer-to-peer lending, portfolio, XIRR

Debitum Investments has introduced a redesigned Overview page that makes portfolio tracking simpler, smarter, and more transparent—marking the first step in a broader roadmap of user-centric improvements.

A New Era of Clarity and Control

The new Overview page now greets investors at login, acting as a single, central dashboard. With a cleaner interface and interactive visuals, it provides an intuitive snapshot of portfolio health—so users can see progress at a glance before diving deeper.

1) Historical Insights at Your Fingertips

Investors can review historical earnings and investments directly on the dashboard. Updated widgets surface real-time figures for total balance, invested and available funds, and cumulative performance—offering an instant view of how a portfolio evolves over time.

2) Transparent Earnings Breakdown

A redesigned earnings chart breaks down what’s driving returns—from regular interest and upcoming Loyalty rewards to referral bonuses and limited-time campaign incentives. Users can switch time frames (e.g., last month or last six months) to reveal trends and focus on the drivers that maximize passive income.

3) XIRR as the True Measure of Performance

Debitum has elevated XIRR (Extended Internal Rate of Return) to a core performance indicator on the Overview page. Unlike simple averages or nominal rates, XIRR accounts for the timing and size of each cash flow, providing an accurate annualized view—especially important when investments occur at irregular intervals.

Why This Matters

With the new Overview page, investors can:

Effortlessly track investment and earnings history
Understand which components are fueling portfolio growth
Measure genuine performance using XIRR

Beyond a visual refresh, this release underscores Debitum’s commitment to transparency and investor empowerment—giving every user more clarity, confidence, and control over their money.

Beyond Tech: The Timeless Strength of Dividend Aristocrats

By MPI22nd October 2025Smart moneyAristocrat, Dividend, Dividend ETF, ETF, GRANOLAS, vanguard

Dividend aristocrats

Beyond Tech: The Timeless Strength of Dividend Aristocrats

Over the last two decades, investor attention has largely gravitated toward technology stocks—for good reason. Innovation cycles and rapid scaling have driven remarkable returns. Yet behind the fanfare lies a durable counterweight: dividend aristocrats and other value-oriented franchises that compound quietly, pay shareholders consistently, and tend to hold their ground when froth leaves the market.

Do these stalwarts still deserve a place in modern portfolios? The evidence says yes.

Resilience When It Matters

Market history shows that quality, cash-generative businesses often cushion drawdowns. During the early-2000s bust, the Nasdaq 100 dropped nearly 85% peak-to-trough. By contrast, Procter & Gamble—a textbook dividend aristocrat—declined by roughly 55%, far less severe. In the 2007–2009 crisis, P&G fell about 41% while broad indices slid deeper. Even in 2022’s inflation-and-rates shock, its relative resilience stood out.

The pattern is familiar: companies with essential products, pricing power, and disciplined capital allocation typically experience shallower drawdowns and recover faster.

What Makes an “Aristocrat”

“Dividend Aristocrats” is more than a metaphor—it’s a designation linked to indices maintained by S&P Global, originally highlighting S&P 500 constituents with 25+ consecutive years of dividend increases. The family now spans multiple regions and methodologies (e.g., S&P Europe 350 Dividend Aristocrats, International Aristocrats, and Monarchs with 50+ years).

Common traits across these universes:

Mature, well-entrenched businesses addressing enduring needs
Strong brands and recurring cash flows
Consistent shareholder returns via dividends (and often buybacks)
Incremental growth via cost optimization and selective expansion

Dividends: A Core Driver of Long-Term Returns

Over long horizons, dividends account for a substantial share of equity total returns—especially when reinvested. Consider Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS: since launch 13 years ago, its total return has surpassed 240%, while the cash distributions alone nearly doubled the starting capital. Reinvestment turns steady income into accelerating compounding.

Why Dividend ETFs Are Back in Focus

In the first half of 2025, global inflows into dividend-focused ETFs climbed to multi-year highs as investors sought stability, income, and diversification amid geopolitical and macro uncertainty. A selection of global UCITS funds available to European retail investors illustrates the spectrum:

Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS — ~€5.8B AUM, ~2,200 holdings; highly diversified with modest single-name weights.
VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS & SPDR S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats UCITS — more concentrated (~100 names), focused on dividend consistency.
Fidelity Global Quality Income UCITS — a quality-tilted approach that even includes mega-cap tech where fundamentals justify it.
Global X SuperDividend UCITS — elevated yield (monthly distributions); note that price return since launch is negative, so total return depends heavily on dividends.

Note: Higher yield isn’t automatically better. Assess sustainability, payout ratios, balance-sheet strength, and sector/region concentration.

Europe’s “GRANOLAS” and the Quality Tilt

Recent market leadership in Europe has gravitated toward the so-called GRANOLAS—GSK, Roche, ASML, Nestlé, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, L’Oréal, LVMH, AstraZeneca, SAP, and Sanofi—firms characterized by global reach, robust margins, and high returns on capital. For income-oriented investors, this underscores the case for a quality bias within dividend strategies.

Portfolio Takeaways

Blend, don’t bet: Pair growth exposure with durable income franchises to balance cycles.
Focus on durability: Prefer businesses with pricing power, essential demand, and prudent capital allocation.
Mind the total return: Evaluate dividends and earnings growth; reinvest to harness compounding.
Diversify smartly: Use broad UCITS ETFs for global reach; complement with selective single-name quality where appropriate.

Tech may dominate headlines, but cash flows and discipline still compound wealth. Dividend aristocrats continue to earn their seat at the table.